Why Cheap No-Name Wearables Often Pose a Security Risk

Low-cost fitness trackers and smartwatches are booming. On online marketplaces, countless models are available for under 30 euros—often from unknown brands. While the price is tempting, these wearables often lack basic security features. In this article, we explain why cheap no-name wearables are problematic from a data protection and cybersecurity perspective.

1. Missing Encryption

Many budget wearables do not encrypt the health data they collect. Data is transmitted in plain text via Bluetooth, allowing it to be intercepted with simple tools. Sensitive data such as heart rate, sleep rhythm, or step count can easily be tapped into.

2. Insecure Companion Apps

Cheap wearables often rely on apps from little-known developers. These apps may:

• Request excessive permissions
• Transmit data to third countries without consent
• Contain vulnerabilities or even malware

Additionally, many of these apps are not regularly updated or maintained, increasing long-term risks.

3. No Firmware Updates

Once sold, many low-cost wearables receive no further support. Known vulnerabilities remain unpatched, allowing attackers to continue exploiting them. This is especially critical for devices that are always connected via Bluetooth.

4. Lack of Transparency

Often, users do not know where their data ends up. The privacy policies of no-name providers are vague or nonexistent. Users have no insight into:

• What data is collected
• How it is processed
• With whom it is shared

This not only violates basic data protection principles but also facilitates misuse.

5. Potential Backdoors and Malware

Some very inexpensive devices have been found to contain pre-installed backdoors. These can:

• Send data to unknown servers
• Activate sensors unnoticed
• Serve as botnet nodes

Such functions are difficult to detect for average users.

6. How to Identify Unsafe Devices

Be wary of the following signs:

• Very low price with extensive functionality
• Unknown brand without manufacturer contact details
• Missing certifications (CE mark, FCC, etc.)
• Companion apps not listed in official app stores
• No information about updates or data usage

7. Recommendations for Secure Wearable Use

• Use only devices from reputable manufacturers
• Read the privacy policy before purchase
• Check whether the app is regularly updated
• Review app permissions and turn off unnecessary ones
• Avoid storing sensitive health data if the device is not trustworthy

Conclusion: Cheap Can Become Expensive

The initial savings on a no-name wearable can lead to high risks. Lack of encryption, unclear data usage, and missing updates make these devices a security hazard. For secure use, it’s better to invest in certified and well-supported models that guarantee user privacy.