Cyber Insurance: No Free Pass

What It’s Really About

The uncomfortable truth: A cyber insurance policy does not replace controls. It only pays if defined obligations are fulfilled and the loss fits within the policy wording. At the same time, underwriting questions are becoming stricter, sublimits tighter, and exclusions more precisely defined. Anyone who dismisses this as bureaucracy pays twice in the end: higher cyber costs during the incident and a policy that contributes little when it truly matters. The objective must be to align the policy and IT security so that claims are demonstrable and response times decrease.

What Is Typically Covered – and What Often Is Not

Policies bundle several components. Sounds good, but the fine print matters. Typical modules include:

• Forensics & incident services: External analysis, containment, communication.
• Business interruption / loss of income: Compensation for downtime costs after defined waiting periods.
• Liability / data breaches: Defense costs, notifications, selected fees.
• Extortion: Negotiation/support; payment only under strict conditions and legal boundaries.

Just as important are the limits. Common exclusions or strict conditions often relate to intentional misconduct, gross negligence, outdated systems without patch discipline, sanctions violations, certain fines (depending on jurisdiction), as well as losses outside defined timeframes or without prior insurer approval. In plain terms: without a verifiable risk management practice, much remains theoretical.

What Insurers Realistically Demand Today

Underwriters no longer ask “if,” but “how well” controls are implemented in practice. Expectations include, among others:

• Phishing-resistant MFA on administrative and critical access; legacy authentication disabled.
• A tested incident playbook with clear decision paths (24/7 reachable, usable out-of-band).
• Backups offline/immutable, documented restore tests with proof of integrity.
• Patch management with SLOs (internet-exposed in days), documented exception processes.
• EDR/logging on critical endpoints/servers with traceable alert handling.
• Access principles (least privilege, JIT for admin rights), maintained inventories (systems & identities).
• Supply chain minimum standards: evidence, contact paths, ad hoc drills with critical providers.

These requirements are not “nice to have” – they are the ticket to reasonable terms and successful claims handling.

The Critical Factor: Proof Over Intention

Insurers settle claims based on evidence, not good intentions. Three elements must be solid:

1) Incident timeline in minutes, not opinions.
Who saw what, when, decided what, and acted how? Timestamps, tickets, pager logs, forensic snapshots. Without a complete timeline, credibility drops – and with it, the likelihood of coverage.

2) Integrity of restoration.
Backups only have value if you can prove they are unchanged and functional under time pressure. Records (checksums, restore duration, approvals) belong in a central repository.

3) Fulfilled obligations
If the policy requires MFA, reporting deadlines, or approval processes, then “almost” equals “no.” Document that requirements existed before the loss and were adhered to during the incident.

Typical Pitfalls – and How to Avoid Them

• Late initial notification: Many policies require early, structured reporting (even if not everything is clear yet). Solution: pre-prepared initial notification + contact list, legally reviewed.
• Unauthorized payments/decisions: Ransom payment, switching forensic providers, or PR actions without approval can jeopardize coverage. Solution: decision tree with approval check.
• “We have MFA – except…”: Exceptions for privileged accounts or remote access are entry points and grounds for denial. Solution: enforce phishing-resistant methods consistently, time-limit and compensate exceptions.
• Backups without drills: No timestamp, no checksums, no proof of integrity. Solution: quarterly restore exercise with documented timings.
• Supply chain without evidence: “Our provider is secure” does not count. Solution: evidence, drill protocols, 24/7 contact – all documented.

How to Pragmatically Align Policy and Operations

Treat the policy as part of your operational documentation. Three building blocks are sufficient for tangible impact:

A) Policy map in the runbook
For each scenario (ransomware, email compromise, web app exploit), half a page: reporting deadline, contact channel, approval rules, limits/sublimits, do’s & don’ts. This page belongs in the incident folder – not only on the intranet.

B) Pre-structured evidence collection
Standard folders with placeholders: “Initial notification,” “Containment log,” “Forensic snapshots,” “Insurer approvals,” “Communication.” When the incident unfolds, teams fill them in real time. Goal: no detective work afterward.

C) Quarterly alignment with underwriting
Do not debate during a claim whether you are “good enough.” A brief, documented review (MFA coverage, patch SLO, restore times, supply chain evidence) creates clarity – and better terms.

What You Should Measure (and Why It Matters)

KPIs are not an end in themselves; they influence premium, retention, and negotiation power:

• MFA coverage (phishing-resistant) for privileged and externally exposed access.
• Patch SLO compliance separated by internet-exposed/internal (including documented exceptions).
• Time-to-contain and MTTR by criticality – verifiable through tickets and pager logs.
• Restore time & integrity of the two most critical processes, tested at least annually.
• Supply chain fitness: Share of critical partners with current evidence/successful drills.
• Initial reporting time to insurer/authorities according to policy terms – no gut estimates.

The more robust these figures, the easier it is to negotiate sublimits, exclusions, and premiums – and the more likely smooth claims handling becomes.

Conclusion: Protection Is Built Before the Loss

A cyber insurance policy is sensible – as part of risk management, not as a substitute. It works when controls are practiced, obligations are understood, and evidence is ready. Those who align policy, processes, and technology reduce cyber costs before the first reimbursement dollar: faster decisions, shorter outages, fewer disputes in claims handling. Anything else is expensive cosmetics – and cosmetics are unreliable in a real incident.

FAQ about blog post